THE DC REVOLUTION - WAVE OF THE WORLD'S POWER FUTURE
In the world of power utilization  we are about to experience a true paradigm shift.  For the past hundred years AC power has been  the standard and the norm at virtually every level of society.  With the use of technologies developed in the  recent electronics revolution, we are about to change that forever - to safer, cleaner, more efficient DC power.
            	  
                  Energy In  Crisis 
                  Power  failures, power shortages, blackouts, escalating power costs, natural  disasters, wars and terrorism are all contributing to energy crises worldwide,  and are fast becoming a fact of our lives today.  These energy crises have become a global  catastrophe.  
                  Insufficient generating capacity, peak demand deficits,  outdated and inadequate power delivery infrastructure, inefficient power  utilization, population growth, industrialization and increased consumer demand  have all added to power shortages and escalating power costs.
              The most viable  solution – and also the most practical and economical – to overcome energy  crises and power shortages is to convert power usage from alternating current  (AC) to direct current (DC), and to provide transportable and portable power  generating sources known as “Microgrids”.   
Why DC?
                  Alternating  current (AC) has  many drawbacks.  In the delivery of power  from the generating source to the consumer, as much as 80% of the originating  power is lost through transformers and power lines -- resulting in only 20%  reaching the end users. In addition, the surges, transients and fluctuations  present on today’s AC power lines produce “dirty” power.  This “dirty” power is an enemy to critical  equipment and appliances that require smooth, non-fluctuating current to  operate efficiently and greatly increases equipment life.
                  
              Direct current  (DC), in  comparison, can reduce these power losses by as much as 60%, resulting in two  to four times more power to end users from the same amount of power  produced.  A regulated DC is free from  surges, transients, and fluctuations delivers “clean” power versus the “dirty”  power typical of AC.  Equipment utilizing  DC power can last four times longer than AC equipment.  DC can be stored in virtually any capacity by batteries, while AC  cannot.  This enables DC products to be  portable as well as cordless, and allows operation during grid power  outages. 
The Second  Electronics Revolution
                  The Electric Power Research Institute  (EPRI) refers to the development of high power electronics and DC power  distribution as the Second Electronics  Revolution.  (EPRI is an institution funded by the U.S.  public utilities to conduct research and development for the advancement of the  power industry.) EPRI’s DC microgrid  project, now in design, calls for decentralized generation facilities  distributing DC current to smaller “neighborhood” networks. All renewable  energy sources - wind, solar, fuel cells, etc. - generate direct current.  Distributed power sources in the future will all utilize one or more of these  methods.
                  
  The DC Microgrid  – Power Source Of The Future
                  A microgrid is a decentralized power generation and  distribution network in which a generating facility produces and distributes  power within a small area compared to the present system in which utilities  build very large centralized generating facilities to deliver power over  hundreds of miles to thousands of customers.   A microgrid system would typically deliver power within a one to  two-mile radius of the source; i.e., “distributed generation” instead of  “centralized generation”.
                  The microgrid concept has the following advantages:
- Lower installation cost of power distribution network
 - Reduction of distribution and voltage conversion losses – by 60-70%
 - Ability to store power easily and cost-effectively
 - Clean transient and distortion-free power
 - Greater safety with lower distribution voltage
 - Ability to quickly and easily provide power to remote areas
 
The Microgrid Program Overview
Micropower Corporation proposes to design and install DC microgrids throughout un- or under-electrified countries of to enable the major portion of the population that has never had electric power to receive it for the first time. Phase One of such a project is to install a microgrid in a village of approximately 300 homes within an area of one square mile (three square kilometers). The project would include the following:
- Comprehensive  Energy Survey and Project Design – A thorough survey of the village  will be conducted to collect data for the project.  A comprehensive design will then be made for  the project including a schedule of homes and buildings, internal layouts, and  a complete Bill of Materials.
 - Generation – Power will be  generated from renewable and non-renewable sources including gas or propane  fueled engine-driven generators, photovoltaic arrays, wind turbines, and fuel  cells.  Power will be generated and  distributed at 280 volts DC with conversion to 48 volts DC for use within homes  and other buildings.  At this voltage,  distribution will be within a three square kilometer (one square mile) area  with the generator station centrally located.
 - Storage – a central  storage bank of batteries will be installed to allow uninterruptible power to  be supplied to the grid with several hours backup.  More than one type of batteries may be used  including advanced lead-acid, lithium polymer, and nickel hydrogen.
 - Homes – Each home will  initially be allotted up to 250 watts of peak demand.  A wiring harness will be provided for  installation of four 20-watt fluorescent lamps driven by a single four-lamp Æon  BB48-420 ballast.  This ballast will  power all four lamps with a draw of 54 watts.   Two convenience outlets will be included that will provide 48VDC for  other appliances such as a DC electric fan.   The home will receive a 300W DC-DC converter to step the 280V  distribution voltage of the grid down to 48VDC for use in the home.  An optional, but recommended piece of  equipment is a battery module with integral automatic charger that would  provide 20 ampere-hour hours of storage.   This would run the fluorescent ballast for approximately 18 hours in  event of grid power failure, or up to four hours with a full 250-watt load.
 - Village Center – It is expected  that the village will have a central facility of some sort, which acts as a  “town hall”, or perhaps a multi-purpose facility.  This building would be provided with adequate  lights to allow evening events including entertainment, worship, political  meetings, education and other such activities.   Refrigeration would be then able to be provided for medicines and other  critical perishables.  It may be expected  that water pumping can also be provided at one or more locations.
 - Controls and  Monitoring – Micropower’s AutomatÆon automated energy metering, monitoring and control package will be installed  at the Powerhouse to allow data gathering in real time from anywhere via the  web, phone line, or satellite.
 
Phase One of the project can be operational within 6-9 months of initial funding, estimated at $500,000. Completion of Phase One of the Project will result in a template that may be easily duplicated in other locations around the country. The data gathered should clearly demonstrate the benefits of such a system in terms of safety, efficiency, security and reliability, and allow comparison of a variety of technologies for their applicability and practicality in a wide range of environments.
Electrification Issues And The DC Solution
                  Pressure for  greater access to electricity and to its benefits continues to be felt  throughout the world.  From the steep,  Æonced hillside slopes of Nepal and the dense, luxuriant jungles of Papua New  Guinea, to the star, expansive desert regions of Tunisia and the forlorn,  windswept plateaus of the Bolivian altiplano, rural populations are  increasingly demanding electricity and the benefits commonly associated with  it.  
Clearly, there is a widespread desire for electricity in rural areas, and some villagers are willing to pay considerably for this commodity. Furthermore, few will dispute the fact that electricity is an intervention that plays a critical role in development. However, to increase its attractiveness to governments and financial institutions, which are usually responsible for initial capital investments in electrification; to encourage its broader replication; to permit a larger portion of the population to avail itself of the benefits customarily attributed to this form of energy; and to contribute to other rural development activities, reductions in the costs associated with distributing and using electricity are needed. Extending the national electricity grid into rural areas has generally been a costly exercise. To have a realistic chance of meeting the demand for electric service in these areas requires progress on two fronts:
- Reducing the costs associated with electrification, and
 - Increasing the benefits and financial returns from the  use of electricity.
 
Critical Issues
                    Cost of Grid Extension.  One reason that high costs are commonly associated with  extending the grid into rural areas is that conventional designs used to supply  densely populated, urban centers are also routinely adopted in remoter areas,  without much thought as to their appropriateness.  The total cost of materials and labor for a  three-phase (three-wire) ACSR line with 70-meter spans supported by galvanized  steel poles commonly encountered worldwide is $5-15,000 per kilometer. With  grid extensions often requiring many kilometers of lines to reach rural  villages, the cost of acquiring, transporting and erecting concrete or tubular  steel poles – particularly in off-road locations, is very significant and often  logistically difficult.  Added to that is  the cost of transformers.  
                    
                    DC Solution:  Locating the generation centrally in the  village itself with wire runs of no more than two kilometers in any direction  results in a major reduction of distribution cost and eliminates the  requirement for large transformers.  The  smaller number of poles required can usually be erected by roadsides or  easy-to-access locations, and underground utilities become an option as well.
Cost of Meter, Meter Reading, and Billing.  Besides the cost of electricity  itself, the cost of an energy meter is an additional expense that dissuades  poorer villagers with minimal disposable income from accessing  electricity.  Likewise, meter reading and  billing costs can add significantly  to the cost of electricity supply for small consumers.  
                  
                DC  Solution: The DC-DC converters in each home or building, which step the  line voltage down to 48VDC for internal use, can simultaneously meter the power  consumption without need of a separate power meter as with AC grid  systems.  This can be read onsite or  remotely when adequate communications capability is available.
Limited Benefits of Electrification.  Because of the costs normally incurred  in electrification and the need to reduce subsidies, benefits attributable to  electrification must be maximized.  But  experiences around the world have shown that initial benefits of rural  electrification have been restricted to lighting.  
                  
                DC  Solution: Recognizing the need to increase the socio-economic impact of  electrification on rural communities, significant thought has been focused on  developing benefit and income-generating end uses.  Experience has further confirmed the fact  that numerous complementary inputs are necessary for this to occur. Æon has  developed and is continuing to develop DC products and appliances with  efficiencies that for the first time make this possible.  
Management.  Electric  utilities hesitate to serve the more remote areas because of the logistical  difficulties and costs they incur in constructing these systems and in  maintaining staff to oversee operations.   The low financial return for their efforts is a further deterrent. 
                  
                DC Solution:  By providing a grid totally within the  service area the costs and logistical difficulties in maintaining the grid are  totally minimized.  Users’ organizations  will also be formed to provide coordination between the villagers and the  utility during project design and construction, to collect monthly fees from  all consumers and deposit them in the utility’s local bank account, and to  maintain liaison between consumers and the utility to resolve technical  problems should they arise.  By placing  the responsibility for the financial success of the project on the villagers  (to reduce operational costs, follow up with delinquent consumers, and ensure  that theft of energy is minimized) the burden on the utility is thereby  minimized.
Lack of Awareness of Electricity.  Most villagers have seen electric  lights; nevertheless, a general lack of awareness of electricity and its uses  tends to prevent potential consumers from maximizing the benefits they might  derive from it.  
                  
                DC Solution:  The utility  will hire and train individuals on a full-time basis to familiarize villagers  with all aspects of electrification – housewiring, safety, tariffs, and end  uses.  Consequently, a very high  percentage of villagers in the service area may be expected to opt for access  to electricity in spite of small disposable incomes.  Through drama presentations, committee  meetings and household visits, they will carry out the following activities:
- Increase awareness among villagers who will have access to electricity of potential uses to which this resource can be put
 - Assist in deciding to what level of consumption consumers should subscribe
 - Share ideas about how best to electrify their homes
 - Respond to other questions potential consumers may have  concerning this new commodity
 
Project Benefits 
                  It is clear from many studies that villagers are willing to  spend more of their income on electricity than they previously spent on energy  sources for which it serves as a substitute – specifically kerosene and  batteries.  They apparently place  sufficient value on this commodity to be willing to incur this financial  “loss”.  The benefits the villagers  themselves typically attribute to electrification are not cost savings but  rather a sense of tranquility, prestige of the community, and simplified tasks  around the house.  The availability of  adequate light allows more to be accomplished after nightfall, including  reading and studies.
While these benefits may be meaningful to consumers, rural electrification must still generate additional revenues to encourage proliferation. To this end, focus must be on developing end uses that will permit consumers to generate income from the electricity to which they will now have access.
Establishment of a DC power company to undertake this effort may be expected to foster:
- New entrepreneurial opportunities for local citizens
 - Creation of many new jobs
 - Attraction of investments to the community
 - Reduced pressure on the forests by substituting electricity for fuelwood
 - Irrigation of crops and agro-processing to increase yield from existing land
 
The utility created by the project will also conduct training courses in enterprise creation to stimulate new ventures, which can make productive use of electricity to generate income and employment.
Reduction  Of Deforestation 
                  One of the largest energy needs in rural areas is for  cooking.  The heavy reliance on fuelwood  and charcoal for this purpose – averaging around 150-200 kg per month per  household -contributes to environmental degradation, especially in marginal  areas already cleared for agriculture. Arresting and eventually reversing the  resulting deterioration of the forest cover is a national priority. This  destructive practice also places a growing burden on women and children, who  spend an increasing number of daylight hours gathering fuelwood as it becomes  more scarce and costly. Additionally, the smoke from indoor fires frequently  contributes to health problems, and deposits soot on walls and throughout the  household. Some of the likely initial such activities may be expected to be  commercial cooking with electricity, displacing use of fuelwood. Since it can  be demonstrated that electricity is more efficient than fuelwood for cooking,  the consumer can save on his energy costs, the utility can increase revenues,  and the negative environmental impact from extracting fuelwood from the  dwindling forests can be reduced.  Other  food-processing activities can yield similar results.
Project  Summary 
                  If the objective is to provide electricity to rural  households in the most cost-effective, sustainable, and environmentally benign  manner, one must be equally receptive to all options, new technologies and  designs, and new institutional approaches to implement and manage these systems.  The implementation of inexpensive, efficient, low-maintenance DC grids enables  unelectrified communities to quickly and painlessly step into the twenty-first  century and begin to safely enjoy the benefits many of us take for granted.